Khatam Khadjimatov, Human Rights defender, NorwayĢ9. Shukhrat Ganiev, Director, Humanitarian Legal Centre, Coordinator of the Central Asian network of protection of human rights defenders, UzbekistanĢ8. Ulugbek Khaydarov, Journalist, Laureate of the Hellman – Hammett international human rights award, CanadaĢ7. Khusniddin Kutbiddinov, Independent journalist, UzbekistanĢ6. Mukhammadsalikh Abutov, Organisation “Tayanch”, SwedenĢ5. Nabidjan Narbutayev, Political Party “Birlik”, SwedenĢ4. Rafik Ganiev, Human Rights Society “Ezgulik”, SwedenĢ3. Bayramali Yusupov, Political refugee, DenmarkĢ2. Avaz Fayazov, International Organisation, “Human Rights Defenders”, SwedenĢ1. David Anderson, Political refugee, NorwayĢ0. Daniel Anderson, Political refugee, Norwayġ9. Mukhiddin Kurbanov, International Organisation of Human Rights Activists, Swedenġ8. Khusan Temirov, Human Rights Defender for freedom of conscience, Swedenġ7. Tulkin Karaev, Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan, Swedenġ6.
Gulshan Karayeva, Chairperson, Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan in the Qashqadarya province, Uzbekistanġ5. Natalya Bushuyeva, Editor-in-Chief, Radio Programme “SOS”, Association for Human Rights in Central Asia, Swedenġ4. Sergey Ignatyev, Coordinator, Project “Arts and Human Rights”, Association of Human Rights in Central Asia, USAġ2. Bashorat Eshova, Coordinator, Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan, Switzerlandġ1. Alisher Taksanov, Independent Journalist, Switzerlandġ0. Abdujalil Boymatov, Chairman, Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan, Irelandĩ. Nigara Khidoyatova, Political figure, UzbekistanĨ. Mukhammad Salikh, Leader, “Erk” Democratic Party of Uzbekistan, Norwayħ. Sanjar Umarov, Leader, Coalition “Sunshine Uzbekistan”, USAĦ. Ismail Dadajanov, Chairman, Democratic Forum of Uzbekistan, Swedenĥ. Jodgor Obid, Poet, Member of the International Pen Club, Austria.ģ. Nadejda Atayeva, President, Association for Human Rights in Central Asia, France.Ģ. The governments of these three countries have to prioritise human rights concerns when considering the sale of weapons to Uzbekistan’s authoritarian regime, which is known for its dire human rights record and total disregard for the lives of ordinary people.ġ. government and the government of Germany to take similar measures to prevent the sale of lethal or dual-use military equipment to Uzbekistan. We, therefore, call upon the members of the British Parliament to disapprove of any sale of weapons systems to Uzbekistan and to appoint a commission that would consider the range of the proposed arms and military equipment for sale to determine whether it can be used against civilians. It is still not too late to stop these deals. If at new tragedy happens, the personalities who initiated this trade deal, including Prime Minister David Cameron and Defence Minister Philip Hammond, should share responsibility for the outcomes of their decision. Should this happen, the responsibility for a new massacre will have to be shared by the governments of the countries that supplied these weapons. Whatever promises it makes to Western governments, this time the ruling regime will most certainly employ any military equipment sold to Uzbekistan by Britain, the U.S. Should new mass protests break out in Uzbekistan, which is becoming more likely every day due to the Uzbek population’s growing discontent with Islam Karmov’s corrupt and repressive regime, there is no doubt that military equipment will again be used against civilians. The government troops deployed Soviet-made armoured personnel carriers (BTR), while a reconnaissance helicopter was used to define targets before the massacre. According to various independent sources, between 500 and 700 people, including women and children, were killed when government forces shot into crowds of peaceful protesters in Andijan in May 2005. History shows that the Karimov regime had no compunction against using military vehicles and helicopters against its own people. In what military campaign will Uzbekistan use these weapons systems? It has also come to light that Uzbekistan is seeking to buy combat equipment, including armoured vehicles and military helicopters from the U.S., UK and Germany. We were surprised that the British government considered only narrow financial and geostrategic considerations in this regard, and not legitimate human rights concerns. According to “ The Times” (Feb 8.2103), the British Ministry of Defence plans to sell military hardware leftover from Afghanistan that is not worth repatriating to Britain to Uzbekistan.